Loading…
Loading…
Grantwork · For grant-funded organisations
The facts a funder asks for at application time are the same ones they ask for at monitoring time — but most teams reconstruct them twice, in different Word documents, months apart. Grantwork keeps funders, conditions and evidence in one record so nothing is written from scratch twice.
The workflow
What changes
Outcome 1
Charity numbers, policies, safeguarding statements and track record come from your reviewed claims register — consistent in every application.
In the product: Funder-form transcription and drafting that pulls from claims and the vault, with citations to check.
Outcome 2
Conditions and reporting deadlines are recorded against each award the day it lands, not rediscovered in a panic before a return is due.
In the product: Per-grant stages and conditions visible across the whole portfolio.
Outcome 3
Outcomes and impact measures accumulate against the grant through the year, so the return is assembled from records rather than memory.
In the product: Impact measures per grant, drawn into monitoring drafts you review before anything leaves the building.
In the workspace
Deliverables
Representative product view — example data
Reporting calendar · every grant, one list
12 September
Community buildings fund · Year 1 monitoring return
30 September
County foundation · end-of-grant report
14 July
Youth trust · impact update
Each return assembles from the impact evidence already recorded against its grant.
Drafting is transcribe, verify, draft, paste: Flowgrid drafts from cited evidence, you verify and paste into the funder's own portal. Flowgrid never submits to a funder, and your data is isolated from every other customer's at the database level.
Is this for you?
Likely a good fit
Probably not yet
Next step
What a pilot looks like